Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878048›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025

Misses and Near Misses in Paediatric Appendicitis: An Eight-Year, Single-Centre Retrospective Review.

Eric Scheier, Walid Abu Zvis, Sarah Borsekofsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric ScheierPediatric Emergency, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3250-9349
Walid Abu ZvisDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Sarah BorsekofskyDepartment of Pathology, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDiagnostic error can result in the appendectomy of a normal appendix, commonly known as negative appendectomy (NA). Missed appendicitis (MA) is related to a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are factors in presentation associated with NA or MA.

methodsThis is a single-centre, retrospective chart review of histology-confirmed appendicitis over an eight-year period. We defined MA as appendicitis diagnosed within the week of a paediatric emergency department discharge for a similar presentation. Negative appendectomy was defined as a histologic examination of the appendix that lacked signs of inflammation.

resultsA total of 845 children had appendicitis on pathologic examination. NA included 69 children, and MA 29 children. Inflammatory markers were lower for children with NA than for children with appendicitis, and children with NA were less likely to undergo CT. Almost half of the children with MA were discharged without laboratory evaluation, and almost three quarters were discharged without imaging evaluation. Half of the children with MA returned with complicated appendicitis.

conclusionIncreased rates of laboratory and/or imaging evaluations in patients with abdominal pain or non-classic gastroenteritis, along with observation or early follow-up, may decrease MA. More frequent use of ultrasound and MRI may keep the NA rate to a minimum.

Indexed as

AppendicitisNear Miss, HealthcareAdolescentAppendectomyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsmissed appendicitisnegative appendectomypediatric appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID39878048
PMCPMC12147407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.