Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877966›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2025

Current practices of pain assessment and analgesic use in laboratory mice: A 2022 FELASA Working Group survey.

Ignacio A Gomez de Segura, Saskia Seeldrayers, Paul Flecknell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carprofen and buprenorphine delivery using micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ignacio A Gomez de SeguraDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5436-5396
Saskia SeeldrayersCentral Animal Facilities, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Paul FlecknellNewcastle University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing and alleviating pain in animals involved in research is critically important. However, the effective implementation of pain management depends on the knowledge and attitudes of the personnel involved. Following a Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations 'Pain in Mice' working group initiative, a questionnaire to survey current practices concerning analgesic use in laboratory mice was distributed to several professional groups in the field of laboratory animal science. Besides demographic data, attitudes to pain and analgesia and sources of information and advice on pain management were assessed. Data were gathered and analysed through an e-survey provider. Most respondents (

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesicsLaboratory Animal SciencePainPain ManagementPain MeasurementAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryMiceSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsanalgesicslaboratory animalsmousePainsurgery

Identifiers

PMID39877966
PMCPMC12120196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.