ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Exploring the influencing factors of patients sending red packets and the necessity of doctor-patient red packet agreements.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Comparative Study of the Doctor-Patient Relationship Model and Decision-Making Style among Chinese and Japanese Doctors.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influencing factors of inpatients giving red packets to doctors and explore the necessity of doctor-patient red packet agreements. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among inpatients and their families who were hospitalized in several hospitals in Chengdu from January to June 2023. The survey asked about the patients' (or their families') attitudes and opinions on whether it was necessary to give red packets to doctors during hospitalization. Results: The vast majority of patients (80.7%) thought that it was not necessary to give red packets to doctors, and 87.0% of patients had never given red packets. 59.7% of patients chose senior doctors as the recipients of red packets, and 90.0% of patients thought that it was necessary to give red packets to doctors in 3A-grade hospitals. Patients' attitudes toward giving red packets were positively influenced by their education level and previous experience of giving red packets. Conclusion: Despite education level and previous experience of giving red packets were all positive influencing factors for patients giving red packets, the proportion of patients who had given or intended to give red packets was relatively low. The majority of patients believed that giving red packets was unnecessary, and they held the view that doctors would not treat them less actively if they did not receive red packets. The question of whether signing a red packet agreement is necessary is worth contemplating at this time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.