Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Exploring the influencing factors of patients sending red packets and the necessity of doctor-patient red packet agreements.

Pingli Li, Lixiang Wu, Jie Zhang, Surong Xiang, Li Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pingli LiDepartment of Gynecology, Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Lixiang WuSchool of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Western Theater Air Force Hospital of PLA, Chengdu, China.
Surong XiangDepartment of Gynecology, Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Li FangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Western Theater Air Force Hospital of PLA, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influencing factors of inpatients giving red packets to doctors and explore the necessity of doctor-patient red packet agreements. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among inpatients and their families who were hospitalized in several hospitals in Chengdu from January to June 2023. The survey asked about the patients' (or their families') attitudes and opinions on whether it was necessary to give red packets to doctors during hospitalization. Results: The vast majority of patients (80.7%) thought that it was not necessary to give red packets to doctors, and 87.0% of patients had never given red packets. 59.7% of patients chose senior doctors as the recipients of red packets, and 90.0% of patients thought that it was necessary to give red packets to doctors in 3A-grade hospitals. Patients' attitudes toward giving red packets were positively influenced by their education level and previous experience of giving red packets. Conclusion: Despite education level and previous experience of giving red packets were all positive influencing factors for patients giving red packets, the proportion of patients who had given or intended to give red packets was relatively low. The majority of patients believed that giving red packets was unnecessary, and they held the view that doctors would not treat them less actively if they did not receive red packets. The question of whether signing a red packet agreement is necessary is worth contemplating at this time.

Indexed as

InpatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesinfluencing factorsinformal paymentsinpatientsred envelopesred packets

Identifiers

PMID39877907
PMCPMC11772493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.