Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877890›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Greater neural delay discounting on reward evaluation in anhedonia.

Chenlu Guan, Shiyu Zhou, Zhao Wang, Bo Gao, Ya Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenlu GuanDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, No. 9 West Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian 116044, China.
Shiyu ZhouDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, No. 9 West Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian 116044, China.
Zhao WangDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, No. 9 West Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian 116044, China.
Bo GaoDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, No. 9 West Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian 116044, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objective: Recent years have witnessed a surge of interest in dissecting the anticipatory and the consummatory aspects of anhedonia in terms of temporal dynamics. However, few research has directly examined reward valuation as a function of time in anhedonia. Method: Using a delay discounting task, this event-related potential study examined the neural representation of rewards available immediately or in six months in a high-anhedonia group ( Results: We found that anhedonia was associated with greater neural delay discounting during reward evaluation. This was evidenced by a blunted effect of reward magnitude on the reward positivity (RewP) in the high-anhedonia compared to the low-anhedonia group when the rewards would be delivered six months later. Representation similarity analysis revealed that the aberration in processing delayed rewards is further corroborated by enhanced neural coding of reward time during the RewP period in the high-anhedonia versus low-anhedonia group. Conclusions: These findings provide empirical evidence to show that anhedonia is driven by a blunted neural representation of future rewards instead of immediate rewards, suggesting an inability to form mental representations of future positive experiences in anhedonia.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaDelay discountingReward positivity

Identifiers

PMID39877890
PMCPMC11773226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.