ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
The impact of temporal distribution on fear extinction learning.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The physiological foundation of extinction improvement by tDCS over the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in healthy humans: an fMRI study.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- A systematic review of spontaneous recovery in human fear conditioning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Representational dynamics during extinction of fear memories in the human brain.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fear extinction is the foundation of exposure therapy for anxiety and phobias. However, the stability of extinction memory diminishes over time, coinciding with fear recovery. To augment long-term extinction retention, the temporal distribution of extinction learning sessions is critical. This study investigated the effects of massed and spaced training (with short and long intervals) on extinction retention compared to a classic protocol. 120 healthy participants were recruited and randomly divided to massed training, spaced training with 20-minutes or 3-hours intervals, and a control group. The control group completed half the number of extinction trials compared to the other groups. The fear conditioning/extinction paradigm consisted of three consecutive days of fear acquisition, extinction, and recall, followed by a second recall one week later. Skin conductance response (SCR) and self-rating questionnaires (ratings of valence, arousal, and fear) were recorded and analyzed using mixed model ANOVAs. The results revealed that during the extinction phase, both massed and spaced protocols showed significantly lower SCRs compared to the control group, with massed training resulting in the largest effects. In the second recall, only the massed extinction group showed no significant difference in SCRs between threat and safety cues. The self-report assessments indicated that the massed extinction group showed furthermore lower arousal than the control group in the first recall. These results suggest that both massed and spaced training promote fear extinction learning, but only massed training improves long-term extinction retention. This study highlights the impact of the temporal distribution and trial number of extinction learning on extinction retention, offering insights for future research on improving fear extinction efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.