Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877865›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2025

Large Language Models Outperform Traditional Natural Language Processing Methods in Extracting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Perseus V Patel, Conner Davis, Amariel Ralbovsky, Daniel Tinoco, Christopher Y K Williams, Shadera Slatter, Behzad Naderalvojoud, Michael J Rosen, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Vivek Rudrapatna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Perseus V PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Conner DavisBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Amariel RalbovskyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Daniel TinocoBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Christopher Y K WilliamsBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Shadera SlatterBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Behzad NaderalvojoudStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Michael J RosenDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Vivek RudrapatnaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY/NUTRITIONT32DK007762 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI James Bayrer · 1998 to 2026
$7.3M
A data science framework for transforming electronic health records into real-world evidenceK99LM014099 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RUDRAPATNA, VIVEK ASHOK · 2023 to 2024
$178k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007762NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are vital in assessing disease activity and treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, manual extraction of these PROs from the free-text of clinical notes is burdensome. We aimed to improve data curation from free-text information in the electronic health record, making it more available for research and quality improvement. This study aimed to compare traditional natural language processing (tNLP) and large language models (LLMs) in extracting 3 IBD PROs (abdominal pain, diarrhea, fecal blood) from clinical notes across 2 institutions. Methods: Clinic notes were annotated for each PRO using preset protocols. Models were developed and internally tested at the University of California, San Francisco, and then externally validated at Stanford University. We compared tNLP and LLM-based models on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value. In addition, we conducted fairness and error assessments. Results: Interrater reliability between annotators was >90%. On the University of California, San Francisco test set (n = 50), the top-performing tNLP models showcased accuracies of 92% (abdominal pain), 82% (diarrhea) and 80% (fecal blood), comparable to GPT-4, which was 96%, 88%, and 90% accurate, respectively. On external validation at Stanford (n = 250), tNLP models failed to generalize (61%-62% accuracy) while GPT-4 maintained accuracies >90%. Pathways Language Model-2 and Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 showed similar performance. No biases were detected based on demographics or diagnosis. Conclusion: LLMs are accurate and generalizable methods for extracting PROs. They maintain excellent accuracy across institutions, despite heterogeneity in note templates and authors. Widespread adoption of such tools has the potential to enhance IBD research and patient care.

Indexed as

Clinical data scienceGPT-4Machine learningPaLM-2

Identifiers

PMID39877865
PMCPMC11772946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.