ArticleAcademic pathology
Challenges in autopsy training for pathology residents: A survey of autopsy directors.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resident training in autopsy provides a foundation of knowledge and skills for forensic pathologists and anatomic pathologists, but obstacles are present in ensuring quality training. A survey of US autopsy service directors at sites with pathology residency programs was used to identify common challenges in resident autopsy training. Respondents (n = 29) largely believed that negative attitudes from residents, faculty, training programs, and/or the medical system at large (34%) and time limitations (34%) were the most significant challenges for residency autopsy training. Regarding the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's decreased autopsy requirements from 50 to 30 required cases, respondents noted decreased difficulty (38% to 7%) for residents to achieve the minimum of cases but increased concerns regarding competency at this minimum (7% to 76%). Other impacts of this reduced requirement included decreased interest from residents after meeting minimum requirements, shortened autopsy rotations, increased resident-free autopsies, and increased use of pathologist assistants. Two programs (7%) described a decreased need for residents to share cases, but no other potential benefit was described. In addition to the value provided to the community through autopsies, autopsy training during residency provides knowledge and skills relevant to anatomic pathologists generally and forms a necessary foundation on which forensic pathology fellows and future autopsy attendings can develop proficiency. Continued effort is needed to promote the importance of autopsies to pathology residents and others and to provide sufficient training to produce pathologists competent in autopsy pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.