Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877789›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Pattern of Abdominal Ultrasound Scan Findings at the Department of Radiology at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital.

Enighe Wananyo Ugboma, Ogheneochuko D Ray-Offor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enighe Wananyo UgbomaRadiology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, NGA.
Ogheneochuko D Ray-OfforRadiology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal ultrasound imaging is a standard diagnostic tool used in clinical practice. Understanding the patterns of sonographic findings in specific population demographics can lead to better clinical decisions and improved patient management. This study will evaluate the prevalent abdominal ultrasound scan findings and explore their demographic patterns based on age and sex characteristics at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital.

objectiveTo evaluate the abdominal ultrasound findings and determine the relationship of these findings with the age and sex of patients.

methodsA hospital-based retrospective study analyzed data from 681 patients who underwent abdominal ultrasound scans at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital using Epi-Info 7.1.4.

resultsThe 681 participants' age distribution peaked in the 30-39 years category (24.7%). The sample included 48.6% males and 51.4% females. The most common ultrasound findings by category were hepatic disorders (n=173, 25.4%) and urogenital disorders (n=143, 21.0%). There were no significant differences in ultrasound findings across genders (p-values >0.05). Mean ages varied across categories, but no statistically significant age-related differences were detected (p-value>0.05).

conclusionThe study gave insights into the demographic patterns of abdominal ultrasound findings at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Notably, there were high rates of hepatic and urogenital disorders. These findings will act as a guide for health professionals to understand common ultrasound findings in the abdomen.

Indexed as

abdominal ultrasounddemographic patternsdiagnosisfindingsupth

Identifiers

PMID39877789
PMCPMC11774447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.