ReviewCureus2024
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Different Delivery Methods for Remineralization Agents in Pediatric Dental Health: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the remineralizing potential of nano-bioactive glass, nano-hydroxyapatite, and sodium fluoride on artificial carious lesions in primary teeth.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Role of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) in White Spot Lesion Remineralization-A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Fluoride Casein Phosphopeptide and Tri-Calcium Phosphate Treatments for Enamel Remineralization: Effects on Surface Properties and Biofilm Resistance.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric dental health is critically impacted by enamel demineralization and early-stage caries, with remineralization therapies playing a vital role in preventing progression. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of various delivery methods for remineralization agents in pediatric patients aged 3-15 years, focusing on varnishes, gels, foams, and sprays. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, or case-control studies involving pediatric patients with early-stage caries or enamel demineralization, while studies with non-pediatric populations, unrelated treatments, or significant methodological flaws were excluded. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Web of Science using keywords like "pediatric," "fluoride varnish," "CPP-ACP," and "enamel remineralization" identified 10 RCTs with 743 participants from countries such as Germany, Italy, Turkey, China, Thailand, Iran, and Brazil. Data extraction followed a standardized protocol, and quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Results showed that fluoride varnishes were the most effective delivery method for high-risk caries populations due to their prolonged retention and sustained fluoride release, while sprays and foams emerged as promising alternatives for behaviorally challenging patients because of their ease of application and better compliance. Gels demonstrated mixed results, indicating that their efficacy might depend on application frequency and patient adherence. The findings also underscore the importance of cultural and regional factors in the acceptance of certain treatment methods. Additionally, long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained effects of sprays and foams in pediatric populations. This review highlights the critical role of delivery methods in the success of remineralization therapies, emphasizing that fluoride varnishes remain the gold standard, while sprays and foams are viable alternatives for specific patient needs. Tailoring treatments to individual patient requirements is essential for optimizing outcomes in pediatric dental health, particularly in addressing diverse patient behaviors and treatment environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.