Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877747›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

AI-guided virtual biopsy: Automated differentiation of cerebral gliomas from other benign and malignant MRI findings using deep learning.

Mathias Holtkamp, Vicky Parmar, René Hosch, Luca Salhöfer, Hanna Styczen, Yan Li, Marcel Opitz, Martin Glas, Nika Guberina, Karsten Wrede and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mathias HoltkampInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-2207
Vicky ParmarInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
René HoschInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Luca SalhöferInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Hanna StyczenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Yan LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marcel OpitzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin GlasDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3167-3403
Nika GuberinaDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Karsten WredeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Cornelius DeuschlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johannes HauboldInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop an automated algorithm to noninvasively distinguish gliomas from other intracranial pathologies, preventing misdiagnosis and ensuring accurate analysis before further glioma assessment. Methods: A cohort of 1280 patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies was included. It comprised 218 gliomas (mean age 54.76 ± 13.74 years; 136 males, 82 females), 514 patients with brain metastases (mean age 59.28 ± 12.36 years; 228 males, 286 females), 366 patients with inflammatory lesions (mean age 41.94 ± 14.57 years; 142 males, 224 females), 99 intracerebral hemorrhages (mean age 62.68 ± 16.64 years; 56 males, 43 females), and 83 meningiomas (mean age 63.99 ± 13.31 years; 25 males, 58 females). Radiomic features were extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), contrast-enhanced, and noncontrast T1-weighted MR sequences. Subcohorts, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, were established for model validation. Machine learning models, primarily XGBoost, were trained to distinguish gliomas from other pathologies. Results: The study demonstrated promising results in distinguishing gliomas from various intracranial pathologies. The best-performing model consistently achieved high area-under-the-curve (AUC) values, indicating strong discriminatory power across multiple distinctions, including gliomas versus metastases (AUC = 0.96), gliomas versus inflammatory lesions (AUC = 1.0), gliomas versus intracerebral hemorrhages (AUC = 0.99), gliomas versus meningiomas (AUC = 0.98). Additionally, across all these entities, gliomas had an AUC of 0.94. Conclusions: The study presents an automated approach that effectively distinguishes gliomas from common intracranial pathologies. This can serve as a quality control upstream to further artificial-intelligence-based genetic analysis of cerebral gliomas.

Indexed as

gliomasmachine learningMRI analysispathology differentiationvirtual biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39877747
PMCPMC11773384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.