ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Hyperspectral estimation of chlorophyll density in winter wheat using fractional-order derivative combined with machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral inversion of winter wheat nitrogen content based on feature optimization and stacking ensemble learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Spectral prediction of anthocyanin concentration inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlorophyll density (ChD) can reflect the photosynthetic capacity of the winter wheat population, therefore achieving real-time non-destructive monitoring of ChD in winter wheat is of great significance for evaluating the growth status of winter wheat. Derivative preprocessing has a wide range of applications in the hyperspectral monitoring of winter wheat chlorophyll. In order to research the role of fractional-order derivative (FOD) in the hyperspectral monitoring model of ChD, this study based on an irrigation experiment of winter wheat to obtain ChD and canopy hyperspectral reflectance. The original spectral reflectance curves were preprocessed using 3 FOD methods: Grünwald-Letnikov (GL), Riemann-Liouville (RL), and Caputo. Hyperspectral monitoring models for winter wheat ChD were constructed using 8 machine learning algorithms, including partial least squares regression, support vector regression, multi-layer perceptron regression, random forest regression, extra-trees regression (ETsR), decision tree regression, K-nearest neighbors regression, and gaussian process regression, based on the full spectrum band and the band selected by competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). The main results were as follows: For the 3 types of FOD, GL-FOD was suitable for analyzing the change process of the original spectral curve towards the integer-order derivative spectral curve. RL-FOD was suitable for constructing the hyperspectral monitoring model of winter wheat ChD. Caputo-FOD was not suitable for hyperspectral research due to its insensitivity to changes in order. The 3 FOD calculation methods could all improve the correlation between the original spectral curve and Log(ChD) to varying degrees, but only the GL method and RL method could observe the change process of correlation with order changes, and the shorter the wavelength, the smaller the order, and the higher the correlation. The bands screened by CARS were distributed throughout the entire spectral range, but there was a relatively concentrated distribution in the visible light region. Among all models, CARS was used to screen bands based on the 0.3-order RL-FOD spectrum, and the model constructed using ETsR reached the best accuracy and stability. Its R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.