Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877726›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-Built Assessment: A Quantitative Scale for the Era of Teleneurology.

Christina N Fournier, Mark Levine, Karon Simmons, Rocío Carolina García-Santibáñez, Anne Rowland, Colin C Quinn, Doreen T Ho, Richard S Bedlack, Jonathan D Glass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina N FournierDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2322-4777
Mark LevineDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2800-8728
Karon SimmonsDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Rocío Carolina García-SantibáñezDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-1766
Anne RowlandDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9279-6507
Colin C QuinnDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-5854
Doreen T HoSean M. Healey and AMG Center for ALS, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3108-7623
Richard S BedlackDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7495
Jonathan D GlassDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-4971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Telemedicine has become a mainstay of ALS clinical care, but there is currently no standardized approach for assessing and tracking changes to the neurologic examination in this format. The goal of this study was to create a standardized telemedicine-based motor examination scale to objectively and reliably track ALS progression and use Rasch methodology to validate the scale and improve its psychometric properties. Methods: A draft telemedicine examination scale with 25 items assessing movement in the bulbar muscles, neck, trunk, and extremities was created by an ALS expert panel, incorporating input from patient advisors. This prospective, observational study was approved by the Emory IRB, and participants provided informed consent. Adults with a diagnosis of ALS who were able to undergo a video telemedicine evaluation by an Emory clinician were eligible for participation. Rasch analyses were performed to determine the final item responses and optimize the scoring structure. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subset of participants through 2 separate examinations by 2 different examiners within a 7-day period. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations with simultaneously administered Rasch-built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) and revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Results: The ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-built assessment was administered to a total of 258 PALS representing the full spectrum of a typical ALS clinic population. After performing Rasch analyses, 3 items were removed and item response categories were consolidated for 8 items. The final 22-item ALS MOTOR scale conformed to Rasch model criteria. The inter-rater reliability was 95%. The ALS MOTOR had a 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83) correlation with ALSFRS-R and 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.85) correlation with ROADS. Discussion: The ALS MOTOR is a novel, accessible tool for remotely and objectively tracking ALS progression for both clinical care and research studies. Use of Rasch methodology for scale validation allowed for optimization of scale psychometric properties, which is particularly important when using the sum score as an overall outcome measure. Longitudinal and external validation studies are ongoing.

Identifiers

PMID39877726
PMCPMC11772018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.