ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Trends of Representation of Women in Professional Medical Societal Leadership in the United States and Europe.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Menopause and neurological disorders: a roadmap for research.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Sustaining momentum in gender equity: Lessons from the women in European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy initiative.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Gender-based disparities in self-reported procedural experience: a cross-sectional survey of medical students in Poland.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Innovation in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Global Endeavor That Starts With One Case Report.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Gender Disparities in Physician Employment, Leadership, and Parental Leave in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There continue to be significant gender disparities with women being underrepresented in medical professional society leadership roles, despite more women entering medical school. Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the pattern of representation of women in medical society presidential positions in the United States and Europe over the past 50 years. It further examines gender-related trends in the field of cardiology and among medical trainees. Methods: Using publicly available data from major medical societies, we calculated the number of male and female presidents in major medical societies across most specialties in the United States and Europe over the past 50 years. We also examined cardiology societies specifically. These numbers and percentages were observed alongside those of medical students, internal medicine residents, cardiology fellows, and attending cardiologists. Results: Women constituted 4% and 0% of medical professional society presidents from 1974 to 2023 in the United States and Europe, respectively; this increased to a respective 32% and 40% in the past decade. For cardiology societies, the United States trended from 7% to 22% female presidents in the past 50 years, and Europe trended from 0% to 10%. Doctor of medicine and doctor of osteopathic medicine students have shown steady increases in women to now greater than 50%. Medicine residents, cardiology fellows, and cardiology attendings all have smaller percentages of women, though the number is increasing with time. Conclusions: While women remain underrepresented in medical professional society leadership in the United States and Europe, there is a trend toward more representation of women, which mirrors growth in this realm among medical trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.