ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Heart Failure in Atrial Fibrillation Subtypes in Women and Men in the Tromsø Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incident heart failure in patients with screening-detected atrial fibrillation: a post hoc analysis of the STROKESTOP and STROKESTOP II studies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Trial
- Sex and Atrial Fibrillation Independently Stratify Cardiac Remodeling and Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation in Women: Pathophysiological Links, Clinical Challenges, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- His Bundle Pacing Improves Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Bradyarrhythmia or Tachy-Brady Syndrome and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist and impact morbidity and mortality. There is limited knowledge on the association of AF subtypes with HF according to sex. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore sex-specific associations between AF subtypes and subsequent HF, identifying HF risk factors in participants with AF, and exploring the combined impact on mortality. Methods: 14,790 women and 13,181 men from the Tromsø Study were enrolled between 1994 and 2008 and followed for incident AF and HF through 2016. Cox regression was conducted to provide HRs and 95% CIs. Results: Those with AF had higher risk of subsequent HF in both sexes compared to those without AF. Women with permanent AF had higher relative risk of HF than men (HR: 10.52; 95% CI: 8.72-12.70, and HR: 7.65; 95% CI: 6.40-9.15, respectively). Risk factors for HF in participants with AF included smoking in all, higher diastolic blood pressure and hypertension in women, underweight, obesity, and low alcohol consumption in men. All-cause mortality was higher in women with both subtypes (paroxysmal/persistent: HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.78-2.48, permanent: HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) and in men with paroxysmal/persistent AF (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.40-1.96). Subsequent HF increased risk of mortality in both sexes. Conclusions: All AF subtypes were associated with increased risk of HF. Smoking was a shared risk factor, while diastolic blood pressure and hypertension were specific to women, and underweight, obesity, and low alcohol intake were specific to men. Subsequent HF increased mortality risk in all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.