ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
LBP-CD155 Liposome Nanovaccine Efficiently Resist Colorectal Cancer and Enhance ICB Therapy.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural polysaccharides targeting mitochondrial function for colorectal cancer prevention and treatment: mechanisms and nano-delivery strategies.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Dynamic stability analysis of a fractional calculus-based colon cancer model with therapeutic interventions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer: Platforms, Mechanisms, and Combinations.Cancers · 2025Article
- Precision nanomedicine: navigating the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy and targeted drug delivery.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Dendritic Cell-Based Cancer Vaccines: The Impact of Modulating Innate Lymphoid Cells on Anti-Tumor Efficacy.Cells · 2025Review
- Nanovaccines in gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Nano-enabled strategies for targeted immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Regulatory effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly malignant and aggressive gastrointestinal tumor. Due to its weak immunogenicity and limited immune, cell infiltration lead to ineffective clinical outcomes. Therefore, to improve the current prophylaxis and treatment scheme, offering a favorable strategy efficient against CRC is urgently needed. Methods: Here, we developed a nanovaccine (LBP-CD155L NVs) loaded with CD155 gene in liposome, which was modified by Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP) through electrostatic interaction. The nanovaccine was characterized by transmission electron microscopy and Zetasizer. It was evaluated in vitro, where NVs facilitated the endocytosis and maturation of DCs, and in vivo, where NVs improved the efficacy of prophylaxis and therapy. In addition, further confirmed the mechanisms by how TLR4 and MGL synergistic pathway endow the nanovaccines towards dendritic cells (DCs). Finally, the safety and tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment were evaluated in the CRC tumor-bearing mouse model. Results: We successfully developed a nanovaccine that facilitates the endocytosis and maturation of DCs via a synergistic pathway involving TLR4 and MGL, which endow the nanovaccines towards dendritic cells (DCs) and promote the differentiation, thereby enhancing the cytotoxicity of CD8 Conclusion: Our work provided that LBP-CD155L NVs may serve as a promising tool for reversing tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhancing ICB therapy in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.