Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877583›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2025

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal prolapse among the global population.

Tharanga Mudalige, Vindya Pathiraja, Gayathri Delanerolle, Heitor Cavalini, Shuqi Wu, Julie Taylor, Om Kurmi, Kathryn Elliot, Sharron Hinchliff, Carol Atkinson and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Tharanga MudaligeUniversity of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka.
Vindya PathirajaUniversity of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka.
Gayathri DelanerolleSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-9245
Heitor CavaliniSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK.
Shuqi WuSouthern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.
Julie TaylorUniversity of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Om KurmiUniversity of Coventry Coventry UK.
Kathryn ElliotSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK.
Sharron HinchliffUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Carol AtkinsonUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Kristina PotocnikUniversity of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7504-3249
Paula BriggsDepartment of Women's and Children's Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Lucky SaraswatUniversity of Aberdeen Aberdeen Scotland UK.
Helen Felicity KempNo affiliation.
George ElejeNnamdi Azikiwe University Nnewi Nigeria.
Toh Teck HockSibu Hospital Sibu Sarawak Malaysia.
Cristina Laguna Benetti-PintoUniversity of Campinas, UNICAMP Campinas Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-5593
Irfan MuhammadPeshawar Medical College Riphah International University Islamabad Pakistan.
Rabia KareemPeshawar Medical College Riphah International University Islamabad Pakistan.
Yassine BoucharebSultan Qaboos University Muscat Oman.
Peter PhiriSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK.
Ruishu ZhangSultan Qaboos University Muscat Oman.
Yunfei WengSultan Qaboos University Muscat Oman.
Ieera AggarwalKK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore.
Jian Qing ShiSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK.
Ashish ShettyUniversity of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka.
Ian LitchfieldUniversity of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Nirmala RathnayakeManchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.
Sohier ElneilUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-5418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs when one or more pelvic organs (uterus, bowel, bladder or top of the vagina) descend from their normal position and bulge into the vagina. Symptoms include pelvic discomfort, fullness, and changes in bladder or bowel function. Treatment ranges from conservative approaches to surgery, depending on symptom severity. Surgical methods include vaginal wall repair, with or without hysterectomy, or via laparoscopic, robotic or open techniques. Common complications include bleeding, infection, and urinary or bowel dysfunction. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, and a protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022346051). Publications from 30 April 1980 to 30 April 2023 were retrieved from multiple databases. Data were analysed using random-effects and common-effects models with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Findings: Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 29 studies used for meta-analysis of vaginal prolapse surgery outcomes. Sixteen studies focused on patients who had undergone hysterectomy alongside prolapse repair. Interpretation: Patients who underwent vaginal prolapse surgery with hysterectomy experienced higher operative and postoperative complication rates than those without hysterectomy. Increased risks included hospital readmission, POP recurrence and re-operation. The review highlighted a lack of diversity in terms of ethnicity, age and comorbidity status, which are essential to fully understanding the impact of POP. Future research should focus on these underrepresented factors.

Indexed as

gynaecologypelvic organ prolapseurologywellbeingwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID39877583
PMCPMC11771496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.