Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877581›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2025

The feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy.

Gal Rinott Mizrahi, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Benjamin Thomas, Philip Dundee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gal Rinott MizrahiThe Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-5903
Nathan LawrentschukThe Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-5618
Benjamin ThomasThe Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.
Philip DundeeThe Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-5051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy (RA-SRC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively searched the prospectively collected surgical database of two highly experienced robotic urological surgeons for cases of RA-SRC, defined as RARC performed post-previous pelvic RT for palliative or oncologic treatment purposes. Collected data included demographic and clinical information and outcome measures including operative course, hospital stay and complications. Results: Eighteen patients were included in the current analysis. All patients had previous RT to the pelvis with 12 patients also having prior radical pelvic surgery. Indications for salvage cystectomy were either palliation ( Conclusion: Our data, together with the limited published data from other cohorts of RA-SRC, suggest that in experienced hands, RA-SRC is feasible, with intraoperative and perioperative complication rates that are lower than the published data for open SRC and are equivalent to open primary RC. These data will contribute to treatment decision making both in patients with post-pelvic radiation symptoms requiring palliation and patients with MIBC considering or treated with trimodal treatment.

Indexed as

intraoperative complicationspelvic radiationpostoperative complicationsradical cystectomyrobotic‐assisted salvage radical cystectomy (RA‐SRC)salvage

Identifiers

PMID39877581
PMCPMC11771485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.