Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877558›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2025

Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes.

Wayne G Brisbane, Alan M Priester, Anissa V Nguyen, Mark Topoozian, Sakina Mota, Merdie K Delfin, Samantha Gonzalez, Kyla P Grunden, Shannon Richardson, Shyam Natarajan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wayne G BrisbaneDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0470-5262
Alan M PriesterDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Anissa V NguyenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Mark TopoozianDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Sakina MotaAvenda Health Culver City California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-0578
Merdie K DelfinDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Samantha GonzalezDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Kyla P GrundenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Shannon RichardsonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Shyam NatarajanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Leonard S MarksDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-179X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes. Subjects/patients and methods: Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2-4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled in a trial of partial gland cryoablation (PGA) at UCLA from 2017 to 2022. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy (MRGB) was performed at diagnosis and at 6 and 18 months following PGA. Utilising Unfold AI (FDA-cleared 2022), which generates a 3D map of GG ≥ 2 PCa margins, we retrospectively estimated TV for each patient. TV was compared against conventional baseline variables as a correlate of a successful primary outcome-defined here as the absence of GG ≥ 2 on follow-up MRGB at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were MRGB at 18 months and failure-free survival, that is, lack of metastasis or salvage whole gland therapy. Receiver operating curves and multivariate analysis were used to determine significance. Results: A successful primary outcome was observed in 77.7% of patients. Significant correlates of a successful ablation were percent pattern 4 and TV; areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.60 and 0.73, respectively. GG was not a correlate of success (AUC = 0.51). A TV of 1.5 cc provided the optimal combination of sensitivity (55.8%) and specificity (85.7%) at 6 months. TV was also significantly associated with secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TV was the variable most associated with 6- and 18-month biopsy success (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 6.1 and 4.2). Utilising TV ≤ 1.5 cc as a PGA criterion would have prevented 72% of failures at the cost of 42% of successes. Conclusion: The AI-based software Unfold AI estimates TV, which is significantly associated with biopsy outcomes after focal cryoablation. The rate of treatment success is inversely related to TV.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefocal therapyMRIprostate cancertumour volume

Identifiers

PMID39877558
PMCPMC11771490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.