ArticleBJUI compass2025
Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing prostate cancer treatment with MR-guided focused ultrasound: the role of expanded ablation-to-lesion volume ratio.European radiology · 2026Trial
- Article
- MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- AI-driven model for early failure prediction after HIFU integrating immediate post-ablation ultrasound and clinical data.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Review
- Advances in focal therapy for prostate cancer: current modalities, outcomes, and future directions.Prostate international · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Whole-mount histopathology as spatial ground truth for artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: a structured narrative review of techniques, models, and translational gaps.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Prostate Cancer Pathway: Screening, Imaging, Pathology, and Biomarkers.Cureus · 2025Review
- Utilization of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection: a comprehensive review of innovations in screening and diagnosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes. Subjects/patients and methods: Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2-4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled in a trial of partial gland cryoablation (PGA) at UCLA from 2017 to 2022. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy (MRGB) was performed at diagnosis and at 6 and 18 months following PGA. Utilising Unfold AI (FDA-cleared 2022), which generates a 3D map of GG ≥ 2 PCa margins, we retrospectively estimated TV for each patient. TV was compared against conventional baseline variables as a correlate of a successful primary outcome-defined here as the absence of GG ≥ 2 on follow-up MRGB at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were MRGB at 18 months and failure-free survival, that is, lack of metastasis or salvage whole gland therapy. Receiver operating curves and multivariate analysis were used to determine significance. Results: A successful primary outcome was observed in 77.7% of patients. Significant correlates of a successful ablation were percent pattern 4 and TV; areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.60 and 0.73, respectively. GG was not a correlate of success (AUC = 0.51). A TV of 1.5 cc provided the optimal combination of sensitivity (55.8%) and specificity (85.7%) at 6 months. TV was also significantly associated with secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TV was the variable most associated with 6- and 18-month biopsy success (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 6.1 and 4.2). Utilising TV ≤ 1.5 cc as a PGA criterion would have prevented 72% of failures at the cost of 42% of successes. Conclusion: The AI-based software Unfold AI estimates TV, which is significantly associated with biopsy outcomes after focal cryoablation. The rate of treatment success is inversely related to TV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.