ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Validation of Siriraj Stroke Scoring System in the Clinical Differentiation of Stroke Sub-types in a resource-limited Setting.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke remains one of the major non-communicable public health disease conditions with resultant high morbidity and mortality. Neuroimaging in the form of Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is adjudged to be the most reliable and efficient method of accurately diagnosing stroke and ruling out differentials. However, in view of cost implication and non-availability, a clinical scoring system known as the Siriraj Stroke Score (SSS) was developed to clinically differentiate stroke types, especially in resource-limited settings. This study sought to validate and determine the role of Siriraj stroke score in the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with acute stroke. Methodology: This is a descriptive prospective study that was conducted over a one-year period. The study populations were adult patients presenting with acute stroke in a tertiary health facility in North-Western Nigeria. Clinical details with neuroimaging in the form of a CT scan were obtained. Data obtained was analyzed using Stata 15. Results: Fifty-four percent (54%) of patients enrolled were males and ischaemic stroke is the commonest stroke subtype present in 69% of patients studied. Altered levels of consciousness, headache and vomiting are important discriminatory variables of the scoring system. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy of Siriraj Stroke Score for haemorrhagic stroke is 92%, 72%, 62%, 95% and 62% respectively. Conclusion: Siriraj Stroke Score with sensitivity greater than 90% is reliable in differentiating the stroke sub-types; the patients in the 'grey zone' will however require neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.