ArticleOphthalmology science
EyeLiner: A Deep Learning Pipeline for Longitudinal Image Registration Using Fundus Landmarks.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Pixel-Based Spatial Modeling Framework for Mapping At-Risk Retina in Geographic Atrophy Progression.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Dynamic Oculomics for Diagnostic Monitoring: Personal Ocular Trends, Risk Stratification and Treatment Response.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-modal and inter-device retinal OCT registration via learning-based feature correspondence.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Patient-level forecasting of geographic atrophy with a biologically grounded Gompertz model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Detecting and measuring changes in longitudinal fundus imaging is key to monitoring disease progression in chronic ophthalmic diseases, such as glaucoma and macular degeneration. Clinicians assess changes in disease status by either independently reviewing or manually juxtaposing longitudinally acquired color fundus photos (CFPs). Distinguishing variations in image acquisition due to camera orientation, zoom, and exposure from true disease-related changes can be challenging. This makes manual image evaluation variable and subjective, potentially impacting clinical decision-making. We introduce our deep learning (DL) pipeline, "EyeLiner," for registering, or aligning, 2-dimensional CFPs. Improved alignment of longitudinal image pairs may compensate for differences that are due to camera orientation while preserving pathological changes. Design: EyeLiner registers a "moving" image to a "fixed" image using a DL-based keypoint matching algorithm. Participants: We evaluate EyeLiner on 3 longitudinal data sets: Fundus Image REgistration (FIRE), sequential images for glaucoma forecast (SIGF), and our internal glaucoma data set from the Colorado Ophthalmology Research Information System (CORIS). Methods: Anatomical keypoints along the retinal blood vessels were detected from the moving and fixed images using a convolutional neural network and subsequently matched using a transformer-based algorithm. Finally, transformation parameters were learned using the corresponding keypoints. Main Outcome Measures: We computed the mean distance (MD) between manually annotated keypoints from the fixed and the registered moving image. For comparison to existing state-of-the-art retinal registration approaches, we used the mean area under the curve (AUC) metric introduced in the FIRE data set study. Results: EyeLiner effectively aligns longitudinal image pairs from FIRE, SIGF, and CORIS, as qualitatively evaluated through registration checkerboards and flicker animations. Quantitative results show that the MD decreased for this model after alignment from 321.32 to 3.74 pixels for FIRE, 9.86 to 2.03 pixels for CORIS, and 25.23 to 5.94 pixels for SIGF. We also obtained an AUC of 0.85, 0.94, and 0.84 on FIRE, CORIS, and SIGF, respectively, beating the current state-of-the-art SuperRetina (AUC Conclusions: Our pipeline demonstrates improved alignment of image pairs in comparison to the current state-of-the-art methods on 3 separate data sets. We envision that this method will enable clinicians to align image pairs and better visualize changes in disease over time. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.