ArticleDiabetology international2025
Depression in pregnant non-diabetic women and women with gestational diabetes in Bangladesh-a comparative study based on multiple logistic regression.
Article in Diabetology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pose significant challenges during pregnancy. Limited literature exists on depression in women with GDM, with most studies focusing on pre-pregnancy diabetes or postpartum depression. This study fills a crucial gap by specifically investigating and comparing antenatal depression among subjects with and without GDM in Bangladesh, utilizing data from the gestational period. Methods: A cross-sectional study with a convenient, purposive sampling technique was undertaken among 111 pregnant women with (66) and without (45) GDM from September 2017 to March 2018 in the BIRDEM-2 GENERAL HOSPITAL, Dhaka. A semi-structured interview schedule was designed with items relevant to socio-demographics, obstetric history, diabetes, and depression. Results: Different degrees of antenatal depression were identified in 61.3% of the subjects (i.e., 27% had mild, 4.5% had moderate, and 29.7% had severe depression, respectively). Out of 45 non-diabetic mothers, 11 (24.4%) had depression whereas out of 66 GDM mothers, 57 (86.4%) have depression. The exploratory analysis revealed that age group, menstruation history, and presence of GDM significantly affected depression but the multiple logistic regression model supported only GDM as a significant factor of depression. All the socio-demographic factors in this study were statistically insignificant to explain depression. Conclusion: The risk of developing depressive symptoms increases with the presence of GDM. Therefore, it is important to screen for depression and provide treatment if necessary in women who are diagnosed with GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.