ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Integrating High-Value Cost-Conscious Care into an Existing Medical School Curriculum.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: High-value cost-conscious care (HVCCC) education has been shown to reduce wasteful health care spending. Incorporating HVCCC into a medical school curriculum can be challenging due to limited curricular time. We explored the feasibility of medical students creating HVCCC peer education within existing platforms at a single urban academic medical school. We reasoned that curricular changes could improve student knowledge, attitudes, and competency with HVCCC within 2 hours and 25 minutes of curricular time. Methods: First-year medical student attitudes and understanding regarding HVCCC were evaluated via a survey before and after the delivery of a mixed asynchronous and in-person HVCCC curriculum created by two medical student peers. The curricula comprised three spaced asynchronous online sessions targeting HVCCC skill development followed by a gamified 90-minute clinical skills lab where students competed to determine the correct diagnosis at the lowest cost. Results: One hundred and twenty-three medical students (out of 145 first-year medical students) completed the presurvey and indicated willingness to participate in the educational innovation, and 54 completed both surveys. Forty-two percent of students agreed/strongly agreed that the curriculum was effective/strongly effective at promoting cost-effective care. Sixty-five percent of students agreed they would likely use these resources during their clinical rotations. Comfort accessing HVCCC resources improved from 4% precurriculum to 41% postcurriculum. There was no significant difference in HVCCC knowledge pre- and postsurvey. Discussion: This educational innovation demonstrated the feasibility of a peer-developed HVCCC curriculum in preclinical education that minimally impacted curricular time and improved student comfort in accessing cost-effective resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.