ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025
Accelerating the momentum to achieve global elimination of hepatitis B infection: a scoping review of hepatitis B guidelines to reduce mother to child transmission.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Consensus Statements on Prevention and Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Malaysia.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- True reactivation versus transient viremia: a retrospective analysis of HBV reactivation in resolved infection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The hepatitis B care cascade among key populations towards global elimination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Early maternal tenofovir treatment and infant vaccination: a scalable model for hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission control in resource-limited areas.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progress towards achieving global elimination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) by 2030 remains unsatisfactory. Prevention of mother to child transmission is crucial but current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) gave diverse recommendations, creating confusion and leading to significant challenges in the practical implementation across various regions owing to global inequity. We reviewed 47 CPGs on the management of hepatitis B during pregnancy against twelve important clinical questions. Of 47 guidelines, 80.9% (38/47) supported the universal approach to HBV screening. To select women for antiviral prophylaxis, 78.7% (37/47) recommended the use of HBV DNA levels, while 31.9% (15/47) recommended the use of HBeAg. Of 37 guidelines recommending HBV DNA levels, 94.6% (35/37) recommended a viral load threshold of >200,000 IU/mL to initiate antiviral prophylaxis. Of 16 guidelines addressing the mode of delivery, 87.5% (14/16) encouraged vaginal birth. Of 30 guidelines addressing breastfeeding, 60% (18/30) recommended breastfeeding. However, controversies were found in the optimal timing of HBV disease evaluation during pregnancy and the ideal timing to stop antiviral prophylaxis after delivery. Of 36 guidelines addressing the timing to initiate antiviral prophylaxis, 25% (9/36) advised starting prophylaxis between 24 and 28 weeks, while 75% (27/36) suggested other timings or provided vague descriptions. Of 38 guidelines addressing birth-dose vaccination, 42% (16/38) emphasized the importance of "vaccination as soon as possible after birth." These deficiencies and discrepancies among CPGs could significantly impede global HBV elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.