ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Increasing robustness of
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality by design strategy of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cell drug products for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Quality by Design (QbD) approach for developing cell therapy products using mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) is a promising method for designing manufacturing processes to improve the quality of MSC products. It is crucial to ensure the reproducibility and robustness of the test system for evaluating critical quality attributes (CQAs) in the QbD approach for manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. In this study, we explored the key factors involved in establishing a robust evaluation system for the immunosuppressive effect of MSCs, which can be an example of a CQA in developing and manufacturing therapeutic MSCs for treating graft-versus-host disease, Methods: We evaluated the performance of an assay system to examine the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) activated with the mitogen phytohemagglutinin (PHA) when co-cultured with MSCs, the so-called one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay. The MLR assay was performed on the same MSCs using 10 PBMC lots from different donors. In addition, 13 cytokine production levels in PHA-stimulated PBMCs were assessed. Results: The PHA-stimulated proliferation response of PBMCs, the action of MSCs in the MLR test, and the cytokine release of the respective PBMCs significantly differed among the PBMC lots (p < 0.05). A correlation analysis between the amounts of cytokines released by PBMCs and the immunosuppressive potency of MSCs showed that IFNγ, TNFα, CXCL10, PD-L1, HGF, and CCL5 production in PBMCs was significantly correlated with the MSC-mediated inhibition of PBMC proliferation (p < 0.05). Therefore, we selected two PBMC lots with high PBMC proliferation and PHA-stimulated cytokine (such as IFNγ and TNFα) release for the subsequent one-way MLR assay. The robustness of the established test system was confirmed by repeating the assay several times on different days for the same MSCs (coefficient of variation <0.2). Conclusions: To make robust the MSC immunosuppressive potency assay system, controlling the quality of PBMCs used for the assay is essential. Evaluating the inflammatory cytokine production capacity of PBMCs is effective in assessing the quality of the MLR assay system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.