Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877243›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in communication2024

Content analysis of conversations on Reddit: reactions to FDA's ENDS prioritized enforcement policy.

Jamie Guillory, Sarah Trigger, Jenna Brophy, Ashley Ross, Stephanie Lane, Annice Kim, James Nonnemaker, Sherry T Liu, Kimberly Snyder, Janine Delahanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in communication, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jamie GuilloryRTI International, Dublin, Ireland.
Sarah TriggerOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Jenna BrophyRTI International, Durham, NC, United States.
Ashley RossOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Stephanie LaneRTI International, Durham, NC, United States.
Annice KimRTI International, Durham, NC, United States.
James NonnemakerRTI International, Durham, NC, United States.
Sherry T LiuOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Kimberly SnyderOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Janine DelahantyOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: On January 2, 2020, the FDA announced a policy focused in part on prioritizing enforcement of flavored (other than tobacco- or menthol-flavored) cartridge-based electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) without premarket authorization. Methods: We used a query to identify Reddit conversations relevant to the policy from January 2 to May 6, 2020. Our sample included 576 posts (46 posts and 530 accompanying comments). Two analysts coded posts for mentions of use behaviors (e.g., switching, quitting), purchasing behaviors (e.g., purchasing from retailer new to the user), and flavored products. We summarized frequencies of coded data and provided illustrative quotes. Results: Only 21.0% (121/576) of posts mentioned use behavior. Switching behavior was the most common use behavior mentioned (50.4%, 61/121). Most switching behavior posts focused on ENDS-related switching (91.8%, 56/61). The most common ENDS-related switching behaviors mentioned were switching to an open tank (45.9%, 28/61) or device with refillable pods/cartridges (44.3%, 27/61); 8.2% (5/61) mentioned switching to disposables. Just 15.5% (89/576) of posts mentioned purchasing behavior, with the most common being purchasing from a retailer new to the user (32.6%, 29/89). Only 6.8% (39/576) of posts mentioned specific flavors. Conclusion: Reddit posts about the policy commonly discussed switching to non-cartridge-based ENDS products, such as open tank systems or disposable devices, and purchasing products from different online sources that were still selling these products. Findings suggest that publicly available Reddit data can complement data from traditional sources (e.g., surveys, sales) to understand potential unintended consequences associated with policies by exploring the public's reactions.

Indexed as

electronic nicotine delivery systemsflavored tobaccopolicypublic policysocial mediatobacco

Identifiers

PMID39877243
PMCPMC11773509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.