Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877241›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students.

Emily Sklar, Gwen M Chodur, Leslie Kemp, Deborah S Fetter, Rachel E Scherr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily SklarDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Gwen M ChodurAggie Compass Basic Needs Resource Center, Davis, CA, United States.
Leslie KempAggie Compass Basic Needs Resource Center, Davis, CA, United States.
Deborah S FetterDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Rachel E ScherrThe Family, Interiors, Nutrition & Apparel (FINA) Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Food insecurity on college campuses is a pressing issue, yet the ways in which students manage challenges and disruptions to their food security status (FSS) are poorly understood. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine knowledge of food insecurity as a concept, evaluate FSS, identify food acquisition-related behaviors, and determine whether these behaviors differ among FSS. Methods: University students at increased risk of experiencing food insecurity ( Results: Despite targeted recruitment efforts, 76% of participants were classified as food secure by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM). Participants were able to define food insecurity and identify circumstances that could contribute to an individual becoming food insecure. However, many participants described experiences that suggested the USDA AFSSM may not accurately capture students' true FSS. Most individuals faced significant challenges in maintaining food security. Participants used a series of coping strategies and food access resources to maintain or improve their food security, regardless of FSS, which included couponing, strategizing when food was low, and sharing food with housemates. Additionally, participants expressed concerns that their use of food access resources may deprive others with greater need. Conclusions: Results from this study shed insight on the complexities of food insecurity in the university setting, providing useful data to inform the development of better programs, outreach, and evaluation tools that encapsulate the many unique factors that make up FSS for students.

Indexed as

college studentscoping mechanismsfood access barriersfood insecurityUSDA AFSSM

Identifiers

PMID39877241
PMCPMC11773212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.