ArticleProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting2018
SIGNALING SEPSIS SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT & VALIDATION.
Article in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-based scenario-driven usability tests are routinely created for health information technology and clinical decision support evaluations. Due to low clinician awareness of sepsis, a study was undertaken to understand clinician performance and preference of different display types for sepsis clinical decision support through multi-centered usability testing. Patient-based clinical scenarios were created to mimic the environment in which providers would interact with clinical decision support. The data provided in the scenarios were drawn from real patient cases from two sepsis databases, including: demographics, visit/operational details, medical history (comorbidities, assessments, vital signs, laboratory values, clinician documentation), and patient disposition/outcomes. The purpose of this work is to inform electronic health record alert optimization and clinical practice workflow to support the effective and timely delivery of high quality sepsis care. This paper discusses the methodology, selection, and validation of patient-based cases used as the clinical scenarios in usability testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.