The administration route of indigestible gut permeability markers modulates urinary marker recovery in calves.

Indigestible gut permeability markers are used to assess gut integrity and can be administered to calves via a milk meal (MM) or orally pulsed (OP). This study investigated how marker administration route (ADM_R) affects the estimation of gut permeability in relation to milk replacer (MR) fat inclusion. Thirty-two newborn Holstein calves were blocked based on their arrival sequence at the facility. Within each block of 4 calves, calves were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments (n = 16/treatment): a MR high in lactose (HL) and a MR high in fat (HF). During the first 5 d, calves were fed 6.0 L/d followed by 7.0 L/d offered in 2 meals per day at 15% solids. To evaluate gut permeability, indigestible markers (lactulose, d-mannitol, and chromium [Cr]-EDTA) were administered in 2 periods, on Tuesday and Thursday in the third week after arrival. Within each block, calves with different MR treatments were randomly assigned to a different marker ADM_R order: MM in the first period and OP in the second (n = 16) or the opposite order (n = 16). Thus, one block of 4 calves included all combinations of MR and ADM_R. Following marker administration, urine was collected over 2 sampling periods: the first from 0 to 6 h and the second from 6 to 24 h. Measurements included weekly BW and daily MR intake and fecal scoring. Intake, growth, and fecal consistency were not affected by dietary treatments or by ADM_R. The urinary recovery of lactulose was greater in calves fed HF during the 6- to 24-h and the overall 24-h collection period. Consistently, d-mannitol recovery tended to be greater in calves fed HF during the 24-h collection. With OP administration, the urinary recovery of all markers was greater between 0 and 6 h, whereas in the 6- to 24-h period, the recovery of lactose and d-mannitol were lower. Over 24 h of collection, Cr-EDTA recovery was greater with OP. No interaction between ADM_R and MR composition was detected. This suggests that both ADM_R were equivalent in assessing the effects of dietary interventions on gut permeability. However, different ADM_R likely affected the trajectory and time spent by the markers in each segment of the gut.