Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877030›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis on Image-Guided Biopsy Samples in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Feasibility Study and Comparison With Surgical Samples.

Louis Gros, Rowena Yip, Arel Golombeck, David F Yankelevitz, Claudia I Henschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louis GrosDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Rowena YipDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Arel GolombeckDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
David F YankelevitzDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Claudia I HenschkeDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Limited information exists on next-generation sequencing (NGS) success for lung tumors of 30 mm or less. We aimed to compare NGS success rates across biopsy techniques for these tumors, assess DNA sequencing quality, and verify reliability against surgical resection results. Methods: We used data from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment study, including patients with lung tumors measuring 30 mm or less who had surgery and NGS on biopsies since 2016. We collected data on biopsy type, nodule characteristics, complications, sequencing feasibility, clinical actionable variants, surgery type, and TNM classification. We compared NGS feasibility and quality between biopsy methods and, for those with NGS on surgical samples, compared feasibility, quality, and detection of actionable variants. Results: Among the 654 participants with lung tumors of 30 mm or less who underwent surgery, 70 had NGS on prior biopsies. The median age was 68.5; 51.4% were male individuals, and 75.7% were smokers. The mean diameter of biopsied nodules was 17.7 mm, with 67.1% fine-needle aspiration, 17.1% computed tomography-guided transthoracic core needle biopsies, and 17.1% endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. DNA sequencing was feasible in 97.1% of biopsy samples; 2.9% had low tumor cellularity. Coverage depth was achieved in 89.7% of biopsies. RNA sequencing was successful in 66.2% of biopsies, especially in core needle biopsies. Actionable alterations were found in 41.4% of patients. Among the participants, 30% had NGS on surgical samples. RNA sequencing was more feasible on surgical samples (95.2% versus 42.9% for biopsies). NGS on surgical samples matched biopsy results in 90% of patients, with 10% showing additional alterations. Conclusion: DNA sequencing succeeded in 97.1% of biopsies of nodules 30 mm or less, whereas RNA sequencing feasibility was lower. NGS on biopsy samples is generally reliable but requires careful review.

Indexed as

Core needle biopsyEarly-stage lung cancerEBUS-TBNAFine needle aspirationNGS feasibilityStage I

Identifiers

PMID39877030
PMCPMC11773006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.