ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Clinical results of carpal tunnel Re-release revision surgery and synovial wrap for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Nerve Wrapping in Recurrent Upper-extremity Compressive Neuropathies: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Autologous nerve coverage in revision surgery for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JPRAS open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a challenging condition when conventional carpal tunnel revision surgery fails to alleviate symptoms. This study aims to assess the outcomes of combining carpal tunnel revision surgery with a synovial wrap for cases of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome in patients who had adhered median nerve, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 10 patients (mean age: 73.7 years, nine females and one male) who underwent treatment for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. The approach involved carpal tunnel revision surgery coupled with a median nerve synovial wrap. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. The procedure involved harvesting a 3.5 cm × 4 cm section of the flexor synovial membrane with a distal ulnar pedicle, which was then wrapped around the adherent site of the median nerve. Physical assessments included the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Tinel sign in the carpal tunnel, thenar muscle atrophy, the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SW test), manual muscle test (MMT) as assessed on the 5-point British Medical Research Council Scale (5/5, normal; 0/5, absent), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire. The physical variables were compared before surgery and at final follow-up. Results: All patients showed some improvement in SW test. The MMT for the abductor pollicis brevis showed significant improvement at final follow-up (3 for four patients, 4 for four patients, and 5 for two patients) compared to pre-surgery assessments (2 for six patients, 3 for two patients, and 4 for two patients). The mean VAS score and DASH score at final follow-up (13.0 ± 10.3, 19.3 ± 12.7, respectively) were significantly lower than those recorded before surgery (76.5 ± 11.1, 52.4 ± 17.1, respectively). The Tinel sign and the thenar muscle atrophy significantly improved from before surgery to final follow-up. Conclusion: Carpal tunnel release with a synovial wrap demonstrated significant improvements in muscle strength, pain relief and function. The synovial wrap method is an effective procedure for treating recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.