ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Using machine and deep learning to predict short-term complications following trigger digit release surgery.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand characterized by pain and locking of the digits during flexion or extension. In cases refractory to nonoperative management, surgical release of the A1 pulley can be performed. This study evaluates the ability of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict short-term complications following trigger digit release surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data for trigger digit release from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) years 2005-2020. Outcomes of interest were 30-day complications and 30-day return to the operating room. Three ML algorithms were evaluated - a Random Forest (RF), Elastic-Net Regression (ENet), and Extreme Gradient Boosted Tree (XGBoost), along with a deep learning Neural Network (NN). Feature importance analysis was performed in the highest performing model for each outcome to identify predictors with the greatest contributions. Results: We included a total of 1209 cases of trigger digit release. The best algorithm for predicting wound complications was the RF, with an AUC of 0.64 ± 0.04. The XGBoost algorithm was best performing for medical complications (AUC: 0.70 ± 0.06) and reoperations (AUC: 0.60 ± 0.07). All three models had performance significantly above the AUC benchmark of 0.50 ± 0.00. On our feature importance analysis, age was distinctively the highest contributing predictor of wound complications. Conclusions: Machine learning can be successfully used for risk stratification in surgical patients. Moving forwards, it is imperative for hand surgeons to continue evaluating applications of ML in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.