ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2024
Prediction of serum neuritin and neuron-specific enolase for prognosis in patients with traumatic brain injury combined with spinal cord injury.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neurological prognostic nomogram integrating biomarkers and clinical indicators for surgically treated patients with osteoporotic spinal fracture and spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Serum Neuritin is a Predictive Biomarker of Poor Neurological Recovery After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Neuron-specific enolase: a potential biomarker in the prediction of pediatric head trauma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serum neuritin and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) have predictive value for the prognosis of patients with combined traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Studying their predictive effects has positive value for disease control and treatment. Methods: Sixty patients with combined TBI and SCI were recruited and rolled into three groups according to prognosis: Group I (n=42, favourable prognosis), Group II (n=11, poor prognosis), and Group III (n=7, death). Clinical indicators were compared between the groups, and the predictive value of different indicators for prognosis was analyzed. Results: The proportion of patients with combined injuries to other organs and hypotension, as well as levels of platelets (PLT), D-dimer (D-D), antithrombin III (AT-III), S100 protein (S100), NSE, and serum neurofilament levels were significantly higher in Groups II and III compared to Group I. Conversely, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were significantly lower in Group I (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that other organ injuries, GCS score, PLT, D-D, and AT-III significantly influenced the prognosis of TBI combined with SCI patients (P<0.05), while hypotension, NSE, serum neurofilament levels, S100, and accompanying organ injuries were highly correlated with the prognosis of TBI combined with SCI patients (P<0.001). The predictive sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of NSE combined with serum neurofilament in predicting the prognosis of TBI combined with SCI patients were significantly higher than the singular predictive efficacy of NSE or serum neurofilament alone (P<0.05). Conclusions: To evaluate the prognosis of TBI combined with SCI patients, consideration should be given to factors such as other organ injuries, hypotension, consciousness assessment, and levels of various biomarkers. Furthermore, combined testing of serum neurofilament and NSE can more accurately predict the prognosis of TBI combined with SCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.