ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Curvilinear association between Framingham Steatosis Index and chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fatty liver disease is potentially linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet the association between the Framingham Steatosis Index (FSI) and CKD remains uncharted. Our study thoroughly investigated the correlation between FSI and CKD, aiming to elucidate the underlying links between these two conditions. Methods: The relationship between FSI and CKD was evaluated using a weighted multivariate logistic regression model, and the curvilinear relationship between FSI and CKD was explored through smooth curve fitting. We engaged a recursive partitioning algorithm in conjunction with a two-stage linear regression model to determine the inflection point. By conducting stratified analyses, the heterogeneity within subpopulations was explored. Results: In the fully adjusted Model 3, which accounted for all covariates, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% CI) for the association between FSI and CKD were 1.01 (0.97, 1.06), indicating no significant statistical association. Sensitivity analysis confirms the stability of the relationship between FSI and CKD. Smooth curve fitting discloses a non-linear association between FSI and CKD. The two-piecewise linear regression model, applied to explore this non-linearity, identified an inflection point at an FSI value of -3.21. Below this threshold, the OR (95% CI) was 0.25 (0.17, 0.37), signifying an inverse correlation between FSI and CKD. Above the inflection point, the OR (95% CI) was 1.19 (1.13, 1.25), suggesting a positive correlation. In the stratified curve analysis, the results were essentially consistent with the overall findings, except for the subgroups with BMI > 30 and age > 50. Conclusion: We found a curvilinear relationship between FSI and CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.