Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39876788›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.

Gerhard A Holzapfel, Jay D Humphrey, Ray W Ogden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerhard A HolzapfelInstitute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-5775
Jay D HumphreyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Vascular Biology & Therapeutics Program, Yale University and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-2025
Ray W OgdenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7002-7028

Funding

US NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body consists of many different soft biological tissues that exhibit diverse microstructures and functions and experience diverse loading conditions. Yet, under many conditions, the mechanical behaviour of these tissues can be described well with similar nonlinearly elastic or inelastic constitutive relations, both in health and some diseases. Such constitutive relations are essential for performing nonlinear stress analyses, which in turn are critical for understanding physiology, pathophysiology and even clinical interventions, including surgery. Indeed, most cells within load-bearing soft tissues are highly sensitive to their local mechanical environment, which can typically be quantified using methods of continuum mechanics only after the constitutive relations are determined from appropriate data, often multi-axial. In this review, we discuss some of the many experimental findings of the structure and the mechanical response, as well as constitutive formulations for 10 representative soft tissues or organs, and present basic concepts of mechanobiology to support continuum biomechanical studies. We conclude by encouraging similar research along these lines, but also the need for models that can describe and predict evolving tissue properties under many conditions, ranging from normal development to disease progression and wound healing. An important foundation for biomechanics and mechanobiology now exists and methods for collecting detailed multi-scale data continue to progress. There is, thus, considerable opportunity for continued advancement of mechanobiology and biomechanics.

Indexed as

HomeostasisModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansbiomechanicsmechanobiologysoft biological tissue

Identifiers

PMID39876788
PMCPMC11775666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.