ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperelastic Cardiovascular NN-FE: A Framework for Integrating Nonlinear Finite Element Solvers with Neural Networks for the Hyperelastic Modeling of Cardiac Valve Tissue.Research square · 2026Article
- Post-MI Remodeling Mechanics of Left Ventricle: Microstructure-Informed Models, Identifiability, and Uncertainty for Patient-Specific Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Physics-Informed Generative Framework to Unsupervised Biomechanical Parameter Estimation for Tool-Tissue Force Prediction from Laparoscopic Depth Maps.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating serial block-face SEM with voxel-based finite element analysis for high-fidelity micromechanical modelling of anisotropic soft tissues: application to human dermis.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Soft tissue mechanosensing and remodeling: the core regulatory role of Piezo/TRPV4 ion channels.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Microstructure-Informed Hyper-Viscoelastic Model Capturing Soft Tissue Tensile Behavior Across Large Deformations.Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids · 2026Article
- Nanozymes for extracellular matrix and cell sheet engineering: biomedical potential and complementary enzymatic strategies.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Statistical analysis of the measured strength parameters of the fresh main intracranial arteries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Immersion Phase Separation 3-Dimensional Printing for Strain-Stiffening Hydrogel Scaffolds.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human body consists of many different soft biological tissues that exhibit diverse microstructures and functions and experience diverse loading conditions. Yet, under many conditions, the mechanical behaviour of these tissues can be described well with similar nonlinearly elastic or inelastic constitutive relations, both in health and some diseases. Such constitutive relations are essential for performing nonlinear stress analyses, which in turn are critical for understanding physiology, pathophysiology and even clinical interventions, including surgery. Indeed, most cells within load-bearing soft tissues are highly sensitive to their local mechanical environment, which can typically be quantified using methods of continuum mechanics only after the constitutive relations are determined from appropriate data, often multi-axial. In this review, we discuss some of the many experimental findings of the structure and the mechanical response, as well as constitutive formulations for 10 representative soft tissues or organs, and present basic concepts of mechanobiology to support continuum biomechanical studies. We conclude by encouraging similar research along these lines, but also the need for models that can describe and predict evolving tissue properties under many conditions, ranging from normal development to disease progression and wound healing. An important foundation for biomechanics and mechanobiology now exists and methods for collecting detailed multi-scale data continue to progress. There is, thus, considerable opportunity for continued advancement of mechanobiology and biomechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.