Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39876767›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025

Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study.

Rajesh K Jain, Jennifer Y Liu, Richard W Grant, Shanzay Haider, Elbert S Huang, Neda Laiteerapong, Kasia J Lipska, Joan C Lo, Howard H Moffet, Melissa M Parker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Changes in treatment eligibility with race-neutral US FRAX would be modest: estimates using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rajesh K JainDepartment of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-284X
Jennifer Y LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Richard W GrantDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Shanzay HaiderDepartment of Endocrinology, KPC Global Health Center, Hemet, CA 92545, United States.
Elbert S HuangDepartment of Medicine and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Neda LaiteerapongDepartments of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Kasia J LipskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Joan C LoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Howard H MoffetDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Melissa M ParkerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Andrew J KarterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MILDA Renne SAUNDERS · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Optimizing Medical Decision Making for Older Patients with Type 2 DiabetesR01AG063391 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HUANG, ELBERT S., KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Research and Mentorship in Medical Decision Making for Chronic Diseases of Older AdultsK24AG069080 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUANG, ELBERT S. · 2020 to 2024
$583k
National Institute of Aging R01-AG063391NIA NIH HHS K24 AG069080NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063391NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), calculate the risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture but do not account for the excess risk of fracture in people with diabetes. We examined the predictive performance of FRAX without BMD in ethnically diverse, older patients with diabetes. Patients included were between ages 65 and 89 from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry and not already taking osteoporosis medications. Race and ethnicity were self-identified. We calculated FRAX without BMD based on baseline characteristics and assessed how well FRAX predicted MOF and hip fracture over follow-up. Predictive performance was based on measures of discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve, AUC) and calibration (observed-to-predicted ratio, O/P). We identified 96 914 patients (47.0% female), of whom 5383 (5.6%) and 1767 (1.8%) had MOF and hip fracture, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr. The AUC for MOF and hip fracture were 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. FRAX mildly underestimated MOF and hip fracture rates (O/P 1.2 for both) overall. Discrimination was similar by race and ethnicity and diabetes duration but was worse in those over age 75 (AUC < 0.7). In some groups, there were substantial calibration errors, such as Hispanic women (O/P: 1.8 and 1.5), Black men (O/P: 1.5 and 1.8), those with duration of diabetes ≥20 yr (O/P: 1.6 and 1.5), and those over the age of 80 (O/P: 1.4 and 1.2) for MOF and hip fracture, respectively. While the discriminatory performance of FRAX without BMD was good overall in patients with diabetes, it underestimated risk in Hispanic women, Black men, those with long duration of diabetes, and in the oldest patients with diabetes. These algorithmic biases suggest that diabetes-specific tools may be needed to stratify fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

AgingBone DensityDiabetes MellitusEthnicityFractures, BoneOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsagingdiseases and disorders of/related to boneepidemiologyfracture preventionfracture risk assessmentosteoporosispractice/policy-related issues

Identifiers

PMID39876767
PMCPMC12010159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.