ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Pollination ecotypes and the origin of plant species.
Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pollinator efficiency, rather than bee decline, explains a shift to hummingbird pollination in tropical montane forests.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Ecological change may be a common initiator of evolutionary pollinator shifts.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Pollination by long-proboscid horseflies and its implications for reproductive isolation among coflowering Satyrium orchids in South Africa.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Divergence of mating systems inPlant diversity · 2026Article
- Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Scaling Relationships Among the Floral Organs ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological niche shifts are a key driver of phenotypic divergence and contribute to isolating barriers among lineages. For many groups of organisms, the history of these shifts and associated trait-environment correlations are well-documented at the macroevolutionary level. However, the processes that generate these patterns are initiated below the species level, often by the formation of ecotypes in contrasting environments. Here, I review the evidence in plants for 'pollination ecotypes' as microevolutionary responses to environmental gradients in pollinator availability. Pollinators are critical for population establishment and persistence in most species, thereby forming part of their fundamental niche. Novel floral trait combinations allow species to exploit particular pollination opportunities in local habitats and evolve primarily through sexual selection due to their effects on mating success. I examine selected case studies on the evolution of pollination ecotypes, including self-pollinating forms, and use these to illustrate challenging practical and conceptual issues. These issues include the paucity of reliable natural history data, the problem of implementing and interpreting reciprocal translocation experiments, and establishing criteria for when allopatric ecotypes should be considered species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.