Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39876736›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Pollination ecotypes and the origin of plant species.

Steven D Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Divergence of mating systems inPlant diversity · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Scaling Relationships Among the Floral Organs ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven D JohnsonCentre for Functional Biodiversity, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-5862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological niche shifts are a key driver of phenotypic divergence and contribute to isolating barriers among lineages. For many groups of organisms, the history of these shifts and associated trait-environment correlations are well-documented at the macroevolutionary level. However, the processes that generate these patterns are initiated below the species level, often by the formation of ecotypes in contrasting environments. Here, I review the evidence in plants for 'pollination ecotypes' as microevolutionary responses to environmental gradients in pollinator availability. Pollinators are critical for population establishment and persistence in most species, thereby forming part of their fundamental niche. Novel floral trait combinations allow species to exploit particular pollination opportunities in local habitats and evolve primarily through sexual selection due to their effects on mating success. I examine selected case studies on the evolution of pollination ecotypes, including self-pollinating forms, and use these to illustrate challenging practical and conceptual issues. These issues include the paucity of reliable natural history data, the problem of implementing and interpreting reciprocal translocation experiments, and establishing criteria for when allopatric ecotypes should be considered species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcotypePlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsPollinationEcosystemFlowersfloral syndromeslocal adaptationmutualismpollinationrange limitsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID39876736
PMCPMC11775599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.