ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Feature-selective adaptation of numerosity perception.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerosity adaptation suppresses early visual responses.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The effect of vection on the use of optic flow cues.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Color-selective numerosity adaptation depends on the automatic categorization of colored information.iScience · 2025Article
- Simultaneous Color Contrast Increments with Complexity and Identity of the Target Stimulus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Feature-selective adaptation of numerosity perception.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Is number a primary perceptual attribute?i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual adaptation has been widely used to infer the existence of numerosity detectors, enabling animals to quickly estimate the number of objects in a scene. Here, we investigated, in humans, whether numerosity adaptation is influenced by stimulus feature changes as previous research suggested that adaptation is reduced when the colour of adapting and test stimuli did not match. We tested whether such adaptation reduction is due to unspecific novelty effects or changes of stimuli identity. Numerosity adaptation was measured for stimuli matched or unmatched for low-level (colour, luminance, shape and motion) or high-level (letters' identity and face emotions) features. Robust numerosity adaptation occurred in all conditions, but it was reduced when adapting and test stimuli differed for colour, luminance and shape. However, no reduction was observed between moving and still stimuli, a readable change that did not affect the item's identity. Similarly, changes in letters' spatial rotations or face features did not affect adaptation magnitude. Overall, changes in stimulus identity defined by low-level features, rather than novelty in general, determined the strength of the adaptation effects, provided these changes were readily noticeable. These findings suggest that numerosity mechanisms operate on categorized items in addition to the total quantity of the set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.