ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Concomitant motor responses facilitate the acquisition of multiple prior distributions in human coincidence timing.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concomitant motor responses facilitate the acquisition of multiple timing priors beyond upper-limb contexts.iScience · 2026Article
- Concomitant motor responses facilitate the acquisition of multiple prior distributions in human coincidence timing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain optimizes timing behaviour by acquiring a prior distribution of target timing and integrating it with sensory inputs. Real events have distinct temporal statistics (e.g. fastball/slowball in ball sports), making it vital to acquire multiple prior distributions. In previous studies, participants acquired two prior distributions by assigning different types of motor responses or motor effectors to each prior. However, in daily tasks, different types of motor responses or effectors cannot always be selected for each target state. Here, we demonstrate that concomitant motor responses (CMRs) can facilitate multiple-prior acquisition. The non-CMR group made timing responses using only their dominant hand, irrespective of the prior distributions (short/long interval), whereas the CMR group selectively added a non-dominant hand response concomitantly to the dominant hand response for one of the priors. The CMR group acquired the two independent priors more quickly, and the divergence between the acquired priors was greater. Facilitation of multiple-prior acquisition was also observed with concomitant vocalization, indicating that this effect is not limited to bimanual interactions. These results demonstrate behavioural contexts that facilitate multiple-prior acquisition while using an identical type of motor response and effector, which can be effective in utilizing Bayesian estimation in daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.