Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39876717›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

A Game of Life with dormancy.

Daniel Henrik Nevermann, Claudius Gros, Jay T Lennon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Game of Life with dormancy.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Henrik NevermannInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Claudius GrosInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jay T LennonDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3126-6111

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungDivision of Biological InfrastructureDivision of Environmental BiologyLife Sciences Division, Army Research OfficeNASA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factors contributing to the persistence and stability of life are fundamental for understanding complex living systems. Organisms are commonly challenged by harsh and fluctuating environments that are suboptimal for growth and reproduction, which can lead to extinction. Many species contend with unfavourable and noisy conditions by entering a reversible state of reduced metabolic activity, a phenomenon known as dormancy. Here, we develop Spore Life, a model to investigate the effects of dormancy on population dynamics. It is based on Conway's Game of Life (GoL), a deterministic cellular automaton where simple rules govern the metabolic state of an individual based on the metabolic state of its neighbours. For individuals that would otherwise die, Spore Life provides a refuge in the form of an inactive state. These dormant individuals (spores) can resuscitate when local conditions improve. The model includes a parameter [Formula: see text] that controls the survival probability of spores, interpolating between GoL ([Formula: see text]) and Spore Life ([Formula: see text]), while capturing stochastic dynamics in the intermediate regime ([Formula: see text]). In addition to identifying the emergence of unique periodic configurations, we find that spore survival increases the average number of active individuals and buffers populations from extinction. Contrary to expectations, stabilization of the population is not the result of a large and long-lived seed bank. Instead, the demographic patterns in Spore Life only require a small number of resuscitation events. Our approach yields novel insight into what is minimally required for the origins of complex behaviours associated with dormancy and the seed banks that they generate.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSporesGame TheoryPopulation Dynamicscellular automatoncomplexityextinctionlongevityseed bankstochastic

Identifiers

PMID39876717
PMCPMC11775590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.