ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2024
Intervertebral disc regeneration - Is it possible?
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound measurements of lumbar spinous process movement during flexion distraction manipulation: a preliminary descriptive cross-sectional study with healthy participants.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- Presence of sacralized lumbar vertebra predisposes to adjacent level lumbar disc degeneration: A cross-sectional study.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate disc metabolism after decreasing the axial load through surgery by assessing the glycosaminoglycan content through a non-invasive method-delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC). Methods: Sixteen patients with mono-segmental disc degeneration (L4-L5 or L5-S1) who underwent posterior lumbar spine fixation with intervertebral distraction of 2 consecutive vertebrae using monoaxial transpedicular screws and lyophilized allograft to achieve segmental fusion, and who had a follow-up period of at least 2 years, were included in this study. The first lumbar disc was used as the control group. The dGEMRIC studies in degenerative and control discs, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis, and disc thickness were reviewed before and after surgery. Results: Visual analogue scale and ODI showed significant improvements (P=.003, P=.0004, respectively). The thickness of the operated discs was increased by an average of 2.41 mm (P=.0004) while maintaining lumbar lordosis (P=.35). In pre- and post-surgery dGEMRIC studies, the operated discs showed a significant di!erence (P=.0013), while the control groups remained approximately unchanged (P=.87). Conclusion: We have demonstrated that by restoring the disc height and reducing the associated pressure, the glycosaminoglycan content can be increased in the discs, as indicated by a decrease in gadolinium binding. Our results suggest that eliminating pressure on intervertebral discs can prevent their degeneration and initiate the regeneration process. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.