ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Synaptic cleft geometry modulates NMDAR opening probability by tuning neurotransmitter residence time.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate computation of ionic concentrations in the synaptic cleft requires the full Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Rules of life at the interface of calcium signaling and mechanobiology.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Calcium dynamics in small spaces: Lessons learned from modeling in dendritic spines.Biophysical journal · 2025Review
- Electrodiffusion dynamics in the cardiomyocyte dyad at nano-scale resolution using the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Morphological trapping of neurotransmitters in synaptic clefts: A new dimension in neural plasticity.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synaptic morphology plays a critical role in modulating the dynamics of neurotransmitter diffusion and receptor activation in interneuron communication. Central physical aspects of synaptic geometry, such as the curvature of the synaptic cleft, the distance between the presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes, and the surface-area-to-volume ratio of the cleft, crucially influence glutamate diffusion and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) opening probabilities. In this study, we developed a stochastic model for receptor activation using realistic synaptic geometries. Our simulations revealed substantial variability in NMDAR activation, showing a significant impact of synaptic structure on receptor activation. Next, we designed a theoretical study with idealized cleft geometries to understand the impact of different biophysical properties on receptor activation. Specifically, we found that increasing the curvature of the synaptic membranes could compensate for reduced NMDAR activation when the synaptic cleft width was large. Additionally, nonparallel membrane configurations, such as convex presynapses or concave postsynaptic densities, maximize NMDAR activation by increasing the surface-area-to-volume ratio, thereby increasing glutamate residence time and reducing glutamate escape. Furthermore, clustering NMDARs within the postsynaptic density significantly increased receptor activation across different geometric conditions and mitigated the effects of synaptic morphology on NMDAR opening probabilities. These findings highlight the complex interplay between synaptic geometry and receptor dynamics and provide important insights into how structural modifications can influence synaptic efficacy and plasticity. By considering the major physical factors that affect neurotransmitter diffusion and receptor activation, our work offers a comprehensive understanding of how variations in synaptic geometry may regulate neurotransmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.