ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant on INR Using Recombinant Prothrombin Time Reagent.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lupus anticoagulants (LA) can interfere with routine coagulation tests such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT). The international normalized ratio (INR) is derived from PT and is used to monitor warfarin therapy. A positive LA result is one of the laboratory criteria of the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria. We report a case in which LA interfered with INR measurement in an APS patient. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 45-year-old man who had experienced multiple episodes of thromboembolism. His INR was consistently high, despite not being on any anticoagulant. Our laboratory used a recombinant PT reagent, Siemens Healthineers Dade® Innovin® on a fully automated coagulometer, the Sysmex CS-2500. PT measurements were repeated using 2 different analyzers, the Sysmex CA-104 and Werfen ACL Top 550 CTS. The PT results were 40.5 s (reference range (RR): 9.3-10.8 s) and 56 s, using Sysmex CS2500 and CS104, respectively. However, the PT was 13.4 s (RI: 10.3-12.7 s) using Werfen ACL Top 550 CTS. We retested the sample using Thromborel® S, a tissue-derived PT reagent, and PT was found to be within the reference range. The patient tested positive for LA, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies. CONCLUSIONS LA can falsely prolong the PT when a recombinant PT reagent is used. When we retested the plasma using a tissue-derived PT reagent - Thromborel® S - PT was within normal limits. Thus, it is important to acknowledge that LA can react differently with different PT reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.