ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Toward Developing Alternative Opioid Antagonists for Treating Community Overdose: A Model-Based Evaluation of Important Pharmacological Attributes.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in New Approach Methodologies at FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Modeling Supports Combinatorial Effects Between Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent Opioid-Induced Cardiac Arrest.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Translational Modeling as a Tool to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Nalmefene in a Community Setting: A Critical Perspective.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Reply to "Translational Modeling as a Tool to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Nalmefene in a Community Setting: A Critical Perspective".Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to increased illicit use of synthetic opioids, various μ-receptor antagonist formulations, with varied pharmacological characteristics, have been and are being developed. To understand how pharmacologic characteristics such as absorption rate and clearance rate affect reversal in treating community opioid overdose, we used our previously published translational opioid model. We adapted this model with in vitro receptor binding data and clinical pharmacokinetic data of three intranasal nalmefene formulations along with an intranasal naloxone formulation to study the reversal of fentanyl and carfentanil-induced respiratory depression in chronic opioid users. Nalmefene has a longer plasma half-life and slower unbinding from the μ-receptor compared to naloxone. For a more rapid reversal of acute overdose-induced respiratory depression, a fast-absorbing antagonist formulation may be of greater utility than a slow-absorbing one containing the same dosage of the antagonist. For preventing renarcotization caused by a long opioid exposure, a slow-clearing antagonist with slow unbinding from the receptor may be of value. While a more potent antagonist with a longer half-life may have the potential to facilitate recovery from respiratory depression for overdose with synthetic opioids, such interventions may also lead to longer and more pronounced withdrawal. This emphasizes the need for a nuanced consideration of several facets while choosing a μ-receptor antagonist, dose, and formulation to treat community opioid overdose cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.