ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Discovering patient groups in sequential electronic healthcare data using unsupervised representation learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUnsupervised feature learning methods inspired by natural language processing (NLP) models are capable of constructing patient-specific features from longitudinal Electronic Health Records (EHR).
designWe applied document embedding algorithms to real-world paediatric intensive care (PICU) EHR data to extract patient-specific features from 1853 patients' PICU journeys using 647 unique lab tests and medication events. We evaluated the clinical utility of the patient features via a K-means clustering analysis.
resultsWe trained a document embedding model under a unique evaluation pipeline and obtained latent patient feature vectors for all 1853 patients. We performed unsupervised clustering to the patient vectors as a downstream analysis and obtained 5 distinct clusters via hyperparameter optimisation. Significant variations (p<0.0001) within both patient characteristics and surgery intervention and diagnostic profiles were detected.
conclusionThe K-means clustering results demonstrated the clinical utilities of the patient-specific features learned from the embedding algorithms. The latent patient features obtained via the embedding process enabled direct applications of other machine learning algorithms. Future work will focus on utilising the temporal information within EHR and extending EHR embedding algorithms to develop personalised patient journey predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.