ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2025
Risk of residual/recurrent cervical diseases in HPV-positive women post-conization depends on HPV integration status.
Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPV integration as a triage tool for HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening.Tumour virus research · 2026Article
- EARLY LIFE-COURSE PATTERNS OF REGISTRY-DEFINED SUBSEQUENT CANCERS AFTER HPV-RELATED MALIGNANCIES IN A U.S. POPULATION-BASED COHORT.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Risk-stratified surveillance after LEEP: a nomogram integrating HPV persistence, margin status, and clinical factors to predict CIN2+ recurrence.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Microbiome-driven resistance in cervical cancer therapy: from mechanistic dissection to clinical translation.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- High-risk HPV genotypes in women with abnormal cytology: a 12-year retrospective study.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is crucial to identify post-operative patients with HPV infection who are at high risk for residual/recurrent disease. This study aimed to evaluate the association between HPV integration and clinical outcomes in HPV-positive women after cervical conization, as well as to identify HPV integration breakpoints.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data of 791 women who underwent cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 (CIN2-3) between September 2019 and September 2023, sourced from the Fujian and Hubei cervical lesion screening cohorts. Among these, 73 women with HPV infection post-conization underwent HPV integration test within 3 months after a positive HPV test. HPV integration test was performed using the high-throughput viral integration detection (HIVID), a sensitive method for genome-wide survey of HPV integration breakpoints.
resultsAmong the 73 participants with HPV infection post-conization, 10 cases (13.7%) were positive for HPV integration. The logistic regression analysis showed a higher residual/recurrent lesions risk in patients with HPV integration (OR = 3.917, p = 0.048). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, age ≥ 45 years (p = 0.016) and HPV integration (p = 0.035) were associated with a higher risk of residual/recurrent CIN at the 1-year follow-up. HPV 52 accounted for the majority of HPV integration genotype (3/10, 30.0%). Surprisingly, HPV 16 had the highest number of HPV average integration sequencing reads (n = 129), followed by HPV 31, 58, 52, 59, 35, and 39. The study also identified 13 HPV breakpoints, including TP63, TLR4, USP10, etc.
conclusionsHPV integration was identified as an independent risk factor for residual/recurrent CIN in HPV-positive women post-conization. Women with positive HPV integration should pay attention to careful post-treatment follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.