Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875849›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical imaging2025

Investigating the significance of SPECT/CT-SUV for monitoring

Tahani O Alkahtani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The predictive role of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tahani O AlkahtaniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. toalqahtani@pnu.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0002-4914-5337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative molecular imaging via single-photon emission computed tomography-derived standardised uptake value (SPECT/CT-SUV) is used to assess the response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients to targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) with [

methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The MEDLINE/PubMed databases were searched from January 2016 to July 2024 to identify relevant articles. The inclusion criterion was the use of quantitative SPECT/CT-SUV during [

resultsA total of five studies were included in this systematic review (two prospective studies and three retrospective studies). The sample sizes of the studies ranged from 6 to 73 patients. The highest number of lesions analysed was 144. Three studies reported the SPECT/CT-SUV following cycle 1, and only one study reported the correlation with pretherapy PET/CT (r = 0.9, p = 0.005). SPECT/CT-SUV changes between the first two to three cycles were reported in one study. None of the studies reported the SPECT/CT-SUV for normal organs. One study reported correlations between SPECT/CT-derived SUV and PET/CT-derived SUV in target and nontarget tissues.

conclusionQuantitative SPECT/CT-SUV can be used to predict responses to subsequent PSMA-TRT cycles. Disease burden and tumour heterogeneity are the leading causes of TRT individualisation.

Indexed as

LutetiumProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenLutetiumLutetium-177PluvictoProstate-Specific AntigenRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticals177Lu-PSMA68 Ga-PSMAProstate cancerQuantitative SPECT/CTStandardised uptake valueTargeted radionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID39875849
PMCPMC11776189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.