Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875838›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

CT features with histopathological correlation in inflammatory versus benign & malignant neoplastic appendiceal mucoceles: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Kumail Khandwala, Nida Sajjad, Dawar Burhan Khan, Amyn A Malik, Wasim Ahmed Memon, Muhammad Owais Rao, Nasir Ud Din, Faheemullah Khan, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kumail KhandwalaDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-8947
Nida SajjadDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dawar Burhan KhanDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amyn A MalikDepartment of Medicine, O'Donnell School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Wasim Ahmed MemonDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Owais RaoDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nasir Ud DinDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Faheemullah KhanDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan. khabab9722@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-5321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesDifferentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsCT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles.

resultsPatients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%.

conclusionOur study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAppendiceal NeoplasmsAppendixMucoceleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansHyperplasiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAppendixBenignComputed tomographyMalignantMucinous neoplasmMucocele

Identifiers

PMID39875838
PMCPMC11776275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.