ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Leveraging Model Master Files for Long-Acting Injectables.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) hosted a public workshop on May 2-3, 2024, titled "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File". The workshop aimed to discuss the application of the Model Master File (MMF) concept in regulatory submissions that contain model integrated evidence (MIE), improving model sharing, model standardization, regulatory consistency, and regulatory efficiency. On Day 1, there was a session dedicated to MMF applications for long-acting injectables (LAIs). This perspective summarizes presentations, panel discussion, and small group discussion for the potential applications of MMFs in LAI product development, including case studies and potential situations in which MMFs can support regulatory submissions. The scientific presentations discussed the application of MMFs in mechanistic physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK), multiphysics simulation, and population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models, as well as the potential utility of a model-integrated bioequivalence (MI-BE) framework. Additionally, challenges and considerations of implementing MMFs for LAIs were discussed in the panel and small groups. The anticipated benefits of MMFs are recognized among model developers, industries, and regulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.