Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875749›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025

Luca Urso, Luigi Manco, Corrado Cittanti, Sara Adamantiadis, Klarisa Elena Szilagyi, Giovanni Scribano, Noemi Mindicini, Aldo Carnevale, Mirco Bartolomei, Melchiore Giganti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  10. [Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Diagnostic accuracy ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Machine Learning Models Derived from [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca UrsoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-3898
Luigi MancoMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-8638
Corrado CittantiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. ctc@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-804X
Sara AdamantiadisDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Klarisa Elena SzilagyiMedical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8959-2121
Giovanni ScribanoDepartment of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5391-3176
Noemi MindiciniOncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Aldo CarnevaleDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-6042
Mirco BartolomeiNuclear Medicine Unit, Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferarra, Italy.
Melchiore GigantiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5319-8685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBuild machine learning (ML) models able to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients based on conventional and radiomic signatures extracted from baseline [ MATERIAL AND

methodsPrimary tumor and the most significant lymph node metastasis were manually segmented in baseline [

results72 pathological uptakes (52 primary BC and 20 lymph node metastasis) at [

conclusionML models trained on PET/CT radiomic features extracted from primary BC and lymph node metastasis could concur in the prediction of pCR after NAC and improve BC management.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDGArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerMachine learningNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPET/CTRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39875749
PMCPMC12008070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.