Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875690›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Referrals to Peer Support for Families in Pediatric Subspecialty Practices: A Qualitative Study.

Alex Kobrin, Olivia Chan, Emily Crabtree, Joe Zickafoose, Amy Wodarek O'Reilly, Edward Schor, Holly Henry, Allison Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex KobrinMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543-2393, USA.
Olivia ChanMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543-2393, USA.
Emily CrabtreeMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543-2393, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6237-0248
Joe ZickafooseMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543-2393, USA.
Amy Wodarek O'ReillyMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543-2393, USA.
Edward SchorStanford University, 1835 Bay Laurel Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. ecrabtree@mathematica-mpr.com.
Holly HenryLucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, 400 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 340, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.
Allison GrayLucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, 400 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 340, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReferrals to peer support (PS) can help families of children with special health care needs in providing emotional support, reducing feelings of stress and anxiety, and improving the care experience. This study aimed to gain providers' perspectives about PS referrals for families of children with special health care needs, including their perspectives on logistics of, barriers to, and facilitators of making referrals as well as the perceived impacts of PS referrals.

methodsThis study builds on a 2022 survey of California pediatric subspecialists about the value and challenges of PS. The study team conducted 20 semistructured interviews with people from pediatric subspecialty practices in California and used a priori themes derived from the interview protocol to develop a codebook, code interview transcripts, conduct a thematic analysis, and summarize findings.

resultsRespondents offered a variety of PS referrals inside and outside their institutions, tailoring referrals to each family's needs and preferences. Social workers and family liaisons were most commonly responsible for making PS referrals. Respondents found that care team collaboration and ease of sharing information about PS resources among colleagues facilitated the referral process. Respondents noted a need for more PS resources, including funding, education, and the need for a network where providers can identify PS resources. DISCUSSION: Encouraging PS program information-sharing within and across organizations could help connect more families to PS services. Future research should assess families' experiences with PS referrals and services to understand approaches that can best meet their needs for information, instrumental, and emotional supports.

Indexed as

FamilyPediatricsPeer GroupReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportAdultCaliforniaChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesCare coordinationCaregiverChildren with special health care needsParent peer supportPediatric subspecialty care

Identifiers

PMID39875690
PMCPMC11821679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.